Slide 1
Slide 1
Slide 1
Slide 1
Slide 1
Slide 1
Slide 1

DOJ Rejects Suggestion For Historian In Federal Gun Law Case

DOJ Rejects Suggestion For Historian In Federal Gun Law Case

December 15, 2022

Story by Kate Anderson

Department of Justice lectern in Washington, DC.(Brendan Smialowski/AFP/Getty Images)© (Brendan Smialowski/AFP/Getty Images)

The Department of Justice advised Monday against bringing in a historian for a federal gun law case in Missouri concerning felons possessing firearms.

The brief was filed after federal judge Carlton Reeves issued an order requesting the DOJ and defendant Jessie Bullock determine whether a historian was needed to explain the context behind the Supreme Court’s ruling in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen. The DOJ is currently engaged in a Missouri lawsuit to determine whether or not former felons have the right under the Second Amendment to obtain a firearm.

In Bruen, the Supreme Court determined that requiring individual gun owners to obtain a permit to carry in public went against the Founders’ intentions for the Second Amendment. The DOJ’s brief argued that the record on the restriction of felon access to guns had been thoroughly examined.

“While determining the historical basis for gun regulations is no doubt important generally, the prohibition against felons possessing firearms is so thoroughly established as to not require detailed exploration of the historical record for the purpose of this case,” the brief read.

Additionally, the DOJ argued in the lawsuit that in this specific case, Bullock has multiple violent crimes on his record including murder, manslaughter, and aggravated assault. Bullock’s long history of violence, the DOJ states, does not require a historian to determine whether or not he would be fit to own a firearm.

“These are serious felony offenses that squarely place Bullock outside the scope of “‘law-abiding, responsible citizens’” whose interest in self-defense the Second Amendment is intended to protect,” the brief stated.

In November, Reeves wrote a harsh order that heavily criticized the Supreme Court’s historical interpretation of Bruen.

“The Bruen Court acknowledged only that “historical analysis can be difficult,” Reeves wrote. “That is an understatement.”

Reeves later criticized the court for expecting judges to “play historian” when determining the intentions of the Founder’s regarding the Second Amendment. Reeves concluded that the court “is not a trained historian” and asked both Bullock and the DOJ to determine within 30 days whether a historian would be needed in order to give an accurate account of previous gun regulations.

“And we are not experts in what white, wealthy, and male property owners thought about firearms regulation in 1791,’ Reeves stated. “Yet we are now expected to play historian in the name of constitutional adjudication.”

Reeves and the DOJ did not respond to the Daily Caller News Foundation’s request for comment. Bullock could not be reached for comment.

All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact [email protected].

Back to News page

“Ninety-eight percent of the people in this country are decent, hardworking, honest Americans. It’s the other lousy two percent that get all the publicity. But then, we elected them.”

Lily Tomlin

“The people who work against your gun rights are basically saying to you, “The right of the criminal to rip you off, rape and kill you shall not be infringed.” And they wonder why we’re a bit testy”

Editor of KABA LIBERTY ADVOCATE, Friday, July 30, 2001

“I declare to you that woman must not depend upon the protection of man, but must be taught to protect herself, and there I take my stand.”


“You may find me one day dead in a ditch somewhere. But by God, you’ll find me in a pile of brass.”

Tpr. M. Padgett

“Using inner city kids as your proof that guns and kids don’t mix, is like using an alcoholic to prove all people will abuse alcohol.”

Lori Broadhead

“How dare politicians continue to pass insane laws forcing good, law-abiding people to be defenseless and helpless.”

Ted Nugent

The said Constitution [shall] never be construed to authorize Congress to infringe or to prevent the people of the United States from keeping their own arms.”

Samuel Adams, Massachusetts' U.S. Constitution Ratification Convention, 1788

“One of the greatest delusions in the world is the hope that the evils in this world are to be cured by legislation.”

Thomas B. Reed (1886)

“No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms.”

Thomas Jefferson, Proposed Virginia Constitution (1776)

“Foolish liberals who are trying to read the Second Amendment out of the Constitution are courting disaster by encouraging others to use the same means to eliminate portions of the constitution THEY don’t like.”

Alan Dershowitz

“Every 13 seconds in America someone uses a gun to stop a crime.”

Sen. Larry Craig

“The AK-47 is not a device of aggression … I devised this machine-gun for the security of my country,”

Mikhail Kalashnikov, April 1997